It may well be that the Republicans reposition themselves as the party of the working class, while the Democrats become the party of the professional class (and underclass).
One also wonders if there is a gender and race based issue here. HR departments are typically more female and more racially diverse than other management departments. The profession is heavily female dominated and seen as a pink collar profession. Is he setting up the usual Republican trope of hard working straight white men against one of the few fields that women and minorities have been able to rise to the C suite?
It may well be that the Republicans reposition themselves as the party of the working class, while the Democrats become the party of the professional class (and underclass).
One also wonders if there is a gender and race based issue here. HR departments are typically more female and more racially diverse than other management departments. The profession is heavily female dominated and seen as a pink collar profession. Is he setting up the usual Republican trope of hard working straight white men against one of the few fields that women and minorities have been able to rise to the C suite?